Read sources
We work from curated papers, extracted metadata, reports, and source-linked validation artifacts.
How it works
How Kurate grades evidence.
Kurate reads a curated evidence base, grades papers with our own quality system, and uses that signal when answering clinical research questions. We show conclusions and provenance without turning the page into an implementation manual.
Apply grading
Kurate considers study design, reporting quality, statistics, registration, and provenance.
Answer carefully
Stronger findings are prioritized; weak, conflicting, or incomplete evidence stays visible with caveats.
Our grading system
Kurate uses a proprietary evidence grading system for source-grounded review. It is not a citation counter and it is not a replacement for clinical judgement.
Similar traditions already exist. GRADE, for example, is widely used in evidence-based medicine. At a high level, frameworks like GRADE consider risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias.
Built by experts
Kurate is built by experts who publish in statistics, research methodology, and metascience. That background shapes how we handle fragile claims, uncertain comparisons, and noisy literature.